Navigation bar
  Print document Start Previous page
 4 of 34 
Next page End  

Major conclusions should be
1.
Peer review process: no
publication without
reproducible description of
complex methodology;
2.
IPCC and related
processes: Have
independent scientists
doing the review; not the
key authors in the field.
3.
Data access: Relevant data
and details of algorithms
need to be made public
even to “adversaries”.
"We have 25 or so years
invested in the work.
Why should I make the
data available to you,
when your aim is to try
and find something
wrong with it." (Jones'
reply to Warwick
Hughes, 21. Februar
2005; confirmed by P.
Jones)
http://www.purepage.com