Data trends at meteoLCD: 1998 to 2011
Trends computed from yearly averages at meteoLCD,
Diekirch, Luxembourg.
Graphs may be freely copied and used, under the condition to cite:
MASSEN, Francis: Data trends at meteoLCD, 1998 to 2011. http://meteo.lcd.lu
Older trends are here!
Ground
Ozone [ug/m3] ("bad ozone") negative trend: -1.2 ug/m3 per year
mean : 38.5 ug/m3
|
![]() |
Total
Ozone Column [DU] ("good ozone") positive trend: +1.4 DU per year (Uccle gives +0.95 for the 1998-2010 period) (see also [16]) Calibration factor applied if needed! Uccle data from WOUDC (stat.53, Brewer#16) mean : 320.8 (Uccle: na ) stdev : 15.5 (Uccle: na ) Small negative trend of -1.5 DU/year since 2002. See [4] [8]
([8] shows strong |
![]() |
CO2
mixing ratio in ppmV The 1998-2001 data are too unreliable to be retained
for the trend analysis. For 2002 - 2011:
The right picture shows the asymptotic CO2 values
(CO2wind)
derived from the model published in [21] . See also [25] |
![]()
|
Air
temperature [°C]
Trend from 1998 to 2010: +0.024 °C per year
mean : 10.33 °C 2002
to 2011: 10.39°C The sensor has
not been moved since 2002! |
![]() |
Diurnal
Temperature Range (DTR) [°C]
|
.![]() |
Total
Yearly Rainfall [mm]
Trend from 1998 to 2011: - 24 mm per year
mean : 702.2 mm
2002 to 2011: 639.1 mm Note: Rainfall readings are possibly too low, as there were several occasions of sensor blocked by bird droppings. |
![]() |
Solar
energy on a horizontal plane mean: 1113.5 kWhm-2 Our data suggest: ΔT =- 0.13 * ΔF |
![]() |
Sunshine
duration (derived from pyranometer data by Olivieri's method) Trend: + 3.6 hours per year mean: 1668 hours Note negative trend from 2004 to 2011: See paper [23] by F. Massen comparing 4 different methods to compute sunshine duration from pyranometer |
![]() |
Biologically
eff. UVB dose on a horizontal plane in kWh/m2
Practically flat trend line for the whole period. mean: 0.130 eff. kWh*m-2 Note small negative trend of - 0.6 eff. Whm-2y-1 from 2004 to 2011,
in accordance to the dimmimg measured by
the pyranometer over the same period.. See [10] and [22] (poster finds slight positive trend in June (+2%) and negative trend in August (-1%), no trend for other months, for period 1991 to 2008) |
![]() |
UVA
dose on a horizontal plane in kWh/m2
Positive trend: + 0.4 k Whm-2 per year, essentially caused by the first and last readings. mean: 54.59 kWh/m2
Note exceptional high 2010 reading causing a visible positive trend of +0.5 kWm-2y-1 : This 2010 reading should be taken with caution, as it leads to a trend opposite to that of both the total irradiance and the UVB dose (without 2010 data trend would be slightly negative from 2004 to 2011) |
![]() |
NO
concentration in ug/m3 (no update to 2011) The 1998-1999 data are too unreliable to be retained. For 2000-2011:: Many (about 25%) missing data in 2011, so this trend and the last data point should be taken with caution! see [11] which gives ~30% reduction from 1990 to 2005 for the EU-15 countries. |
![]() |
NO2
concentration in ug/m3
The 1998-1999 data are too unreliable to be retained. For 2000-2011: Many (about 25%) missing data in 2011, so this trend and the last data point should be taken with caution!
|
![]() |
Enthalpy of moist air in kJ/kg
See [24] on how the energy contentof moist air is
calculated. Several authors, as Prof. Roger Pielke Sr. insist that air
temperature is a poor metric for global warming/cooling, and that the energy
content of the moist air and/or the Ocean Heat Content (OHC) are better. |
![]()
|
References:
1 | Europe's Environment 4th AR (2007) Fig. 2.2.3 http://reports.eea.europa.eu/state_of_environment_report_2007_1/en/Belgrade_EN_all_chapters_incl_cover.pdf |
2 | EPA: Ozone trends. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/ozone.html |
3 |
Jonson et al: Can we explain the trends in European ozone levels? Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 5, 5957–5985, 2005. http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/5957/2005/acpd-5-5957-2005.pdf |
4 | Ozone trends at Uccle http://ozone.meteo.be/ozone/trends.php |
5 | Rebetez, Beniston: Analyses of the elevation dependency of correlations between sunshine duration and diurnal temperature range this century in the Swiss Alps. 1998. |
6 | R.G. Vines, CSIRO: European rainfall patterns. International Journal of Climatology, vol.5, issue 6, p. 607-616. |
7 | http://global-warming.accuweather.com (15 Jan 2009). |
8 | J.W. Krzyscin, J.L.Borkowski: Total ozone trend over Europe: 1950 - 2004. ACPD, 8, 47-69, 2008. |
9 | NASA: Solar Physics: The Sunspot Cycle. |
10 | de Backer et al: ftp://ftp.kmi.be/dist/meteo/hugo/posters/20080630tromso_hdb.pdf (temporarly unavailable) |
11 | EEA: Emission trends of NOx 1990 - 2005 |
12 | L. Motl: http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/12/uah-msu-temperatures-for-2009-and.html . Dec.2009 |
13 | K. Makovski: The daily temperature amplitude and surface solar radiation..Dissertation for the degree of doctor of sciences. ETHZ 2009. |
14 | A. Ohmura: Observed long-term variations of solar irradiance at the earth's surface. Space Science Reviews (2006) 125: 111-128 |
15 | J. van Oldenvorgh: Western Europe is warming much faster than expected. Clim.Past. 16Jan.2009 |
16 | Van Malderen, De Backer, Delcloo: Revision of 40 years of ozone measurements in Uccle, Belgium. Poster, EGU2009, Vienna. |
17 | EEA: Air pollution by ozone across Europe during summer 2009 |
18 | Climate4 you: Global temperature trends |
19 | Lindzen & Choi: On the determination of climate feedback from ERBE data (GRL, 2009) |
20 | Scafetta, N.: Empirical analysis of the solar contribution to global mean air surface temperature change. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2009 (doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2009.07.007) |
21 |
Massen, F., Beck, E. :Accurate
estimation of CO2 background level from near ground
measurements at non-mixed environments
in: Leal, W., editor: The Economic, Social and
Political Elements of Climate Change
Climate Change Management, 2011, Part 4,
509-522. Springer.
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_31
|
22 | De Backer & Van Malderen: Time series of daily erythemal UVB doses at Uccle Belgium. Poster, July 2009. |
23 | Massen, F.: Sunshine duration from pyranometer readings, 2011 |
24 | Massen F., Calculating moist enthalpy from usual meteorological measurements (July 2010) and Calculating moist enthalpy revisited (Sep. 2010) |
25 | CDIAC: Online Trends |
Addendum 1 | Lindzen & Choi [19] define the non-feedback
climate sensitivity as ΔT0 = G0*ΔQ, where G0
= 0.25 Wm-2 and ΔQ is the change in radiative forcing.
A change of -2 kWh*m-2y-1 corresponds to ΔQ
= -0.23 Wm-2 and should yield a cooling of ΔT0
= -0.25*0.23 = -0.06 K (or °C). Scafetta defines a climate sensitivity in respect to changes in solar radiation by k1s = ΔT/ΔF and finds k1s = 0.053. Our data give ΔT/ΔF= + 0.03/(-0.23) = - 0.13. The relatively good agreement found with both Lindzen's and Scafetta's results that existed in 2010 does not hold anymore at 2011. |
||
Addendum 2 | It makes for an interesting exercise to compare
the influence of mean yearly solar forcing on moist enthalpy and air
temperature for the decade 2002 to 2011.
|
file: meteolcd_trends.html
francis.massen@education.lu
last revision: 01 Nov 12